PROJECT 1947
FEAF Korean UFO Intelligence Summaries 1951-52
U. S. Navy documents concerning the USS Philippine Sea
Report from Dr. Hynek’s files.
By Jan L. Aldrich
The Project Blue Book case index indicates a number of cases are characterized as “missing.” Many of these of these are actually misfiled or interfiled in other case files. Some were found in the 4602d Air Intelligence Service Squadron files or in the Office of Special Investigations files. Others are contained on Project SIGN microfilms. Some, however, are in fact just missing.
Dr. Hynek, especially during the latter days of Project Blue Book, received copies of UFO-related messages, investigations and case files. Sometimes Hynek had material which was listed as missing, or had additional information for cases which were not found in the Project Blue Book files at all. The following material regarding the Philippine Sea case, while summarized in the ATILO FEAF Radar cases report, is not listed as an actual Project Blue Book case.
Military correspondence passing up and down the chain of command usually has the last comment on top with the initial correspondence next, then the intermediate comments are
attached. To enable an easier understanding of the timeline of events, the following
documents from Dr. Hynek's private files are displayed in chronological order.
The first item is a teletype Priority message from the Philippine
Sea to the Commander Naval Forces, Far East (COMNAVFE) dated 0645
hours 03 Feb 1952 Zulu (Greenwich Mean Time) which seems to be the
initial report of the sighting. Handwritten on the message is "To
CNO" with Priority circled. This probably indicated that the
message was to be re-transmitted to the Chief of Naval Operations
(CNO) in Washington, D. C. Information copies were sent to the
Commander 7th Fleet (COM7THFLT) and the Commander of Task Force 77
(CTF 77) (The Navy elements which were conducting operations off
Korea.)
Click Image to Enlarge
COMMANDER NAVAL FORCES, FAR EAST
TOKYO, JAPAN
SECURITY INFORMATION
|
|
FROM: PHILIPPINE SEA
|
|
TO : COMNAVFE
|
|
INFO: COM7THFLT/OTF 77/
|
CORRECTED COPY
CORRECTIONS UNDERLINED
|
REFER COMNAVFE INST ØØ3521.3 X POSITION 37 44 NORTH 13Ø 3Ø EAST
X COURSE 18Ø X SPEED 13 X TIME Ø21935 ITEM X RADAR PHENOMENA
APPROACHED FROM ØØØ TRUE DISTANCE 25 x CLOSED TO 25 COMMENCING WlDE
TURN TO EAST THEN OPENING ON HEADING 355 X MEASURED SPEED 1Ø MILES
PER MINUTE FIRST MlLE 15 MILES PER MINUTE SECOND MILE 3Ø MILES PER
MINUTE THIRD MINUTE X OPENED AS 2 CONTACTS 5 TO 12 MILES APART
X SPS 6B AND SX FUNCTIONING NORMALLY X OBJECT PICKED UP BY SPS6B
ONLY X THREE EXHAUST FLAMES SIGHTED VISUALLY AND REPORTED INDEPEN-
DENTLY TO THE BRIDGE BY THREE SIGNAL BRIDGE OBSERVERS AS AIRCAFT
EXHAUSTS BEARING ØØØ TO Ø6Ø TRUE DURING TIME CONTACT REVERSED
COURSE X WEATHER VIS 1Ø MI WITH 5 TENTHS O/C X VISUAL SIGHTING
POSITION ON ANGLE 3 DURING. TIME CONTACT WAS HELD ON SCOPE AT 17
MILES
X ESTIMATED ALTITUDE 52,ØØØ FEET X CONTACTS OPENED ON COURSE 355
FADING AT 11Ø MILES
READDRESSED:
FM: COMNAVFE ADMIN Ø4ØØ28Z
INFO: CINCFE/ FEAF/CNO
TOR: Ø3/1226Z
|
DTG: Ø3Ø645Z FEB 52 |
BWC/OL: Ø3/1415Z
|
CB : 1Ø2Ø |
ACTION: 25
|
|
INFO: ØØ Ø1 Ø2 Ø3 11 2Ø DCB
|
|
PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED
CONSULT CRYPTO CENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING
Next is a deferred teletype message from the CNO to the Philippine Sea
with questions concerning the report dated 2122 (0922 P. M.) 6 Feb
52 Zulu time. Information copies also routed to COMNAVFE, COM7THFLT, and CTF
77.
Click Image to Enlarge
COMMANDER NAVAL FORCES, FAR EAST
TOKYO, JAPAN
SECURITY INFORMATION
|
DEFERRED |
FROM: CNO
|
|
TO : USS PHILIPPINE SEA
|
|
INFO : COMNAVFE/COM7THFLT/CTF 77
|
|
YOUR Ø3Ø645Z ADDITIONAL INFO REQUESTED X WAS EFFORT MADE TO PUT SX
ON TARGET X WHAT IS RADAR OPERATORS EVALUATION OF TYPE OF TARGET ON
SCOPE X WAS RADAR CONTACT MAINTAINED THROUGH ENTIRE ARC OF VISUAL
OBSERVATION FROM ØØØ TO Ø6Ø X CAN VISUAL OBSERVATIONS BE RECONCILED WITH STATED VISIBILITY AND RADAR RANGE X RADAR PHENOMENON NOT
ENTIRELY NEW EXCEPT FOR CONCURRENT VISUAL SIGHTING
REF : PHIL SEA Ø3Ø645Z REFER COMMAVFE INST ØØ3521.3 X
POSITION 37 44 NORTH 13Ø 3Ø EAST X COURSE 18Ø X SPEED
13 X TIME...ETC...
TOR: Ø7/Ø224Z
|
DTG: Ø62122Z FEB 52 |
BWC/AFY: Ø7/Ø831Z
|
CB : 2429 |
ACTION: 25
|
|
INFO: ØØ Ø1 Ø2 Ø3 11 2Ø DCB
|
|
PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED
CONSULT CRYPTO CENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING
Another deferred message from the Philippine Sea to the Chief of
Naval Operations dated 8 February 1952 answering questions from the
CNO posed in an earlier message (6 Feb 52, page 7). Copies also to
7th Fleet and Task Force 77. A Deferred message probably refers to
a message which was delayed by other higher-rated messages or
because teletype circuits were inoperative or down for maintenance.
Click Image to Enlarge
COMMANDER NAVAL FORCES, FAR EAST
TOKYO, JAPAN
SECURITY INFORMATION
|
DEFERRED |
FROM: PHILIPPINE SEA
|
|
TO : CNO/COM7THFLT/CTF 77/COMNAVFE
|
|
YOUR Ø322122Z X ATTEMPT TO PUT SX ON TARGET WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS X
RADAR OPERATORS EVALUATION, NORMAL TARGET DURING CONTACT APPROACH
AND REVERSAL OF COURSE X AS CONTACT OPENED EVALUATION
DOUBTFUL. X RADAR CONTACT MAINTAINED ON SCOPE THROUGH ENTIRE ARC
VISUAL OBSERVATION FROM ØØØ TO Ø6Ø X IN VIEW OF EXISTING VISIBILIY
AND INDICATED RANGE OF CONTACT ON SCOPE ACCURACY OF COINCIDENT
VISUAL SIGHTING WAS DEPENDENT ON EITHER SIZE OR BRILLIANCE OF
OBJECT
REF: CNO, Ø621222Z YOUR Ø3Ø745Z ADDITIONAL INFO REQUESTED X
WAS EFFORT MADE TO PUT SX ON TARGET X ..ETC...
TOR: Ø8/1833Z
|
DTG: Ø6ØØ15Z FEB 52 |
JP/RAG: Ø9/Ø61ØZ
|
OB : 3186 |
ACTION: 25
|
|
INFO: ØØ Ø1 Ø2 Ø3 11 2Ø DC8
|
|
PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED
CONSULT CRYPTO CENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING
|
U.S.S. PHILIPPINE SEA (CV-47)
Care Fleet Post Office
San Francisco, California
|
Refer to
File No.
CV47/J15 |
|
|
20/DHS/br |
|
|
Serial 002 |
|
|
11 FEB 1952 |
From: |
Commanding Officer, USS PHILIPPINE SEA (CV-47) |
To: |
Commander Naval Forces, Far East |
|
|
Subj: |
Tracking of Radar Phenomena; information regarding |
|
|
Ref: |
(a) ComNavFE Instruction 003521.3 of 8 August 1951
(b) USS PHILIPPINE SEA dispatch 030645Z of 3 February 1952
|
|
|
Encl: |
(1) Sketch of radar track |
1. In compliance with reference (a) the following information
pertaining to the tracking and visual sighting of radar phenomena,
previously reported in reference (b) is herewith submitted.
2. Information required by paragraph 2a of reference (a) is
contained in reference (b) and is quoted herewith:
REFER COMNAVFE INST 003521.3 X POSITION 3744N 1303CE X COURSE 180 X SPEED 13 X TIME 0219351 X RADAR PHENOMENA APPROACHED FROM 000 TRUE DISTANCE 25 X CLOSED TO 20 COMMENCING WIDE TURN TO EAST THEN OPENING ON HEADING 355 X MEASURED SPEED 10 MILES PER MINUTE FIRST MINUTE 15 MILES PER MINUTE SECOND MINUTE 30 MILES PER MINUTE THIRD MINUTE X OPENED AS 2 CONTACTS 5 TO 12 MILES APART X SPS6B AND SX FUNCTIONING NORMALLY X OBJECT PICKED UP BY SPS6B ONLY X THREE EXHAUST FLAMES SIGHTED VISUALLY AID REPORTED INDEPENDENTLY TO THE BRIDGE BY 3 SIGNAL BRIDGE OBSERVERS AS AIRCRAFT EXHAUSTS BEARING 000 TO 060 TRUE DURING TIME CONTACT REVERSED COURSE X WEATHER VIS 10 MI WITH 5 TENTHS OVC X VISUAL SIGHTING POSITION ANGLE 3 DURING TIME CONTACT WAS HELD ON SCOPE AT 17 MILES X ESTIMATED ALTITUDE 51000 FEET X CONTACTS OPENED ON COURSE 355 FADING AT 110 MILES
3. Information as required by paragraph 2b of reference (a) is
as follows:
a. A sketch of the radar track is included in this report as
enclosure (1).
b. At the time of first sighting of the object on the radar
scope, the presentation was of normal size and brilliance for an
average air contact at that range. At approximately fifty (50)
miles range, and at about the time that the contact split, the
presentation decreased in size and brilliance. No other air contacts
were held at this time. The eastern
coast of Korea was clearly visible on the scope at a range of
approximately sixty five (65) miles, as was the island of ULLUNG DO,
at a range of twenty (20) miles. The only other contact was the
escorting DD, bearing 180° T at 2000 yards.
c. The frequency of the SPS6B radar was 1310 megacycles with a
pulse repetition rate of 130 pulses per second. The pulse width was
5 microseconds and the antenna rotation rate was 5 RPM. Range
scales used were 80 and 200 miles. Sea return was negligible. Radar
was checked and was apparently functioning normally.
d. The SPS6B radar does not have a tiltable antenna.
e. The weather at time of tracking contact was reported to be;
visibility ten (10) miles and an overcast of five tenths coverage
at three (3) thousand feet. An unsolicited report of visual
sighting of three exhaust flames was made by the signal bridge to
Conn, at the same time, and, on the same bearing as the contact.
The visual contact’s tract coincided with the radar track as shown
in enclosure (l).
4. An evaluation of the phenomena described above has not been
determined by this command. Ordinarily such a contact would have
undoubtedly been evaluated as radar interference, however, the
simultaneous visual sighting, as described above, creates doubt as
to the plausibility of such an assumption.
The letter from the Commander of Naval Forces Far East to the Chief of Naval Operations in Washington, D. C., dated 8 April 1952 transmitting the radar-visual report. Note that the letter comments that this seems to be the first (Navy) incident of both radar and visual sighting of a high speed target. This letter acts as a letter of transmission and also lets the higher commander know that the intermediate commander is cognizant of the material.
Note that the letter is dispatched by Registered Mail which means that each person who touches the pouch in the delivery process must sign for it. This also slows down the transmission of the information. The stamp of the receiving mail room indicates that it was received on 21 April and it is routed to “32”. The number 32 indicates the Office of Naval Intelligence.
Click Image to Enlarge
File: CNFE/A8-3 |
COMMANDER U.S. NAVAL FORCES, FAR EAST |
25/GMR/si |
Serial: 00712 |
NAVY No. 1165
F.P.O., SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF.
|
|
|
|
8 APR 1952 |
From: |
Commander Naval Forces, Far East |
To: |
Chief of Naval Operations |
|
|
Subj: |
Tracking of Radar Phenomena; report on |
|
|
Ref: |
(1) Copy of CO USS PHILIPPINE SEA (CV-47) ltr ser 002
of 11 Feb 1952, with track
|
1. Enclosure (1) is forwarded for information and evaluation.
This is probably the first instance of a visual and radar contact
on a high speed aerial target being made simultaneously in the Far
East.
2. Transmission by United States registered mail or registered
guard mil is authorized in accordance with Article I5l5,
U. S. Navy Regulations, 1948, and Article 0705, U. S. Navy Security
Manual for Classified Matter, 1951.
Copy to:
CINCPACFLT (with encl (1))
COMSEVENTHFLT (with encl (1))
PHILIPPINE SEA (CV-47)
Finally a communication signed by C. L. Gilbert dated 31 May 1952, under the letterhead of the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO). The Director of Naval Intelligence also used this letterhead. This is a letter of transmission sending documents related to the sighting to ATIC. Copies are also sent to the USAF Director of Intelligence, Commander-in-Chief, the Pacific Fleet, Commander, Naval Forces, Far East, Commander of the Seventh Fleet, and USS Philippine Sea.
Please note that the item is forwarded under reference from instructions issued in 1950. While newer requests for information and reporting instructions had been distributed, they had apparently not yet reached all areas of the intelligence collection and handling system. Besides the distribution to Naval Intelligence, the routing indicates copies were also sent to Air Force Intelligence.
Hynek’s handwritten comment in the upper left corner is “Sigma 4 C 7 Radar-Vis” Sigma indicates level of Strangeness while “C” indicates a Credibility rating. (See next document.)
Click Image to Enlarge
|
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
|
|
|
|
IN REPLY REFER TO
0p-322F2(D3B)/im,
Ser 00940P32
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 MAY 1952 |
From: |
Director of Naval Intelligence |
To: |
Commanding General, Air Material Command
Attention: ATIC |
|
|
Subj: |
Report of unconventional aircraft sighting; forwarding of |
|
|
Ref: |
(a) DNI Conf. ltr Ser 016236P32 dtd 19 Oct 1950 and enclosure
thereto (AFOIN Memo to CNO(DNI) of 18 Sept 1950)
|
|
|
Encl: |
CNFE Secret ltr Ser 00712 dtd 8 April 1952 w/encl
|
1. The enclosure to reference (a) indicated a continuing
interest in the subject of unconventional aircraft and invited any
cooperation that might be extended. Enclosure (1) is forwarded
accordingly.
2. It will be seen that, when considered separately, the two
phenomena witnessed in the enclosure have been reported previously on
numerous occasions. With the information at hand, this office could
only enumerate the usual possibilities, and there is not enough
specific information to make an evaluation which would be specific
enough to be of value. When the observations are considered
together, the picture is not necessarily clearer, and the only
conclusion left is that the phenomena were probably merely a
coincidence. If the addressee deems that enclosure (1) warrants any
further evaluation, the results of such an evaluation would be of
interest to this office.
Copy to:
Dl/USAF
CinCPACFLT
CNFE
COMSEVENTHFLT
PHILIPPINE SEA (CV 47)
Note that the chronology of the Navy documents and the events surrounding the Life Magazine article are quite interesting.
http://www.project1947.com/fig/lifememo52a.htm
Both the Navy and the Air Force are dealing with a UFO hot potato. The Air Force with the twin sightings at Sunchon and Wonsan for 29/30 January and the Navy for the Philippine Sea sighting just a few days later on 2 February 1952. In the meantime, other UFO events are happening. The incident involving the Secretary of the Navy, Dan Kimball, (Ruppelt in his papers said he only heard rumors of this, there was no official report.) It occurred just about the time the press got wind of the Sunchon/Wonsan incidents, Senator Russell's request for information and the formal report from the Philippine Sea arriving in Washington. This must have made for some interesting internal discussions within both services. A good question would be: Was the AF aware of the Philippine Sea incident before 31 May? Did the Navy share the messages sent back and forth from Korea?