Washington Evening Star - May 1, 1968
By John Lannan
If there's any one element on which all parties to the Unidentified
Flying Object controversy agree, it's the fact that every thing about
UFOs is up in the air.
And the situation didn't change a whit yesterday as the leader of the
National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena announced in
State Department tone and rhetoric that "we have broken
relations" with a government-funded UFO investigation.
Retired Marine Corps Maj. Donald E. Keyhoe charged that the University
of Colorado study headed by physicist Edward U. Condon was anything
but scientific and that Condon and the resident project head were
openly biased.
The move followed publication in Look magazine of a report of
deceptive memos, staff firings and a negative outlook on UFOs by the
project leaders.
Series of Tempests
The current UFO crisis is but one of a series of tempests surrounding
the oft-reported, but scientifically undocumented, sightings of
strange saucer-like forms and shapes in flight.
Long under study by the Air Force in several separate projects, UFOs
have managed to move even the studiously academic scientific community
as well as government into supporting an objective study. NICAP, one
of the less strident, but nonetheless dedicated parties, claims it
also wants a balanced, scientific appraisal of the problem.
At its behest, and at that of others, the government financed a
$500,000 project to answer UFO questions.
NICAP, which also challenged the earlier Air Force probes, now terms
that study the "Colorado Fiasco."
Message to Johnson
Maj. Keyhoe announced at yesterday's press conference that he has also
written President Johnson apprising him of NICAP's views and asking a
new study.
Before the session turned into a nose-to-nose confrontation between
Keyhoe and author Philip Klass over Klass' allegations that UFOs are a
form of ball lightning, Keyhoe read portions of a memo allegedly from
the project leader, Robert Low, to the university of Colorado's vice
president, Thurston Manning.
In it, Low is alleged to have said that to enter such a study
objectively, "one has to admit the possibility that such
things as UFOs exist. It is not respectable to give serious
consideration to such a possibility."
Further, the memo continued:
"The trick would be, I think, to describe the project so
that, to the public, it would appear a totally objective study
but, to the scientific community, would present the image of a group of
non-believers trying their best to be objective but having an almost
zero expectation of finding a saucer..."
Maj. Keyhoe also charged that the investigating staff of the project
was made up chiefly of psychologists whose goals were to examine the
credibility of the witnesses rather than their purported evidence for
sightings.
NICAP does not argue, he added, that either Low or Condon was being
dishonest. "Both seemed to believe they were being correct in their
approach," he said.
|
|