Repeated sightings that began in late 1966 and recurred for many months, arousing widespread interest, were identified as a jet aircraft engaged in aerial refueling training practice.
Background
During late 1966, mysterious lights began to appear over the central part of an agricultural valley in the South Pacific. Local residents soon began to report them as UFOs, and the resultant publicity led eventually to investigation by NICAP and this project. These sightings, instead of reaching a peak and tapering off, continued for many months. By summer of 1967 interest was intense. Most of the sightings were witnessed from a site near a foothills town located at the eastern slope of the valley.
The key witness in the area was a resident (Witness I) of the town. He and his wife had observed, logged, and photographed UFOs on numerous occasions during the preceding months. He also coordinated an UFO surveillance network using Citizens Band radio which covered a radius of approximately 80 miles. As principal contact in the area, he provided background information that included names of witnesses, taped interviews, and photographic evidence. This material proved invaluable in preliminary assessment of the situation.
Sightings, General Information
The sightings fell into two groups: one (hereafter referred to as the primary group) was highly homogeneous and comprised approximately 85% of the total number of sightings. Objects in the primary group appeared as orange-white lights above the valley at night.
Sightings from the smaller group will be reported separately, as they form a heterogeneous assortment that is clearly discontinuous with the primary group.
Photographs
The high frequency of primary-group sightings provided Witness I with numerous opportunities to take pictures with a tripod-mounted Rolleiflex camera. The resulting photographs, while providing no answers to what the objects were, did constitute firmer evidence than the unsupported testimony of witnesses.
Area Features
Investigation
After detailed discussions with local NICAP people, including Witness I and his wife, project investigators decided to try to observe the UFOs themselves. On the night of 12 August they saw nothing unusual. On 13 August, however, the following events occurred:
At 10:30 p.m. a light appeared low in the southern sky, travelling
Meanwhile, another light had appeared to the east of the presumed aircraft, travelling west at a similar angular rate. This light was not obviously an aircraft, but appeared as a dull orange light that varied somewhat in intensity as it moved. The object could have been an aircraft. Witness I, however, said that it was exactly the kind of thing that had been reported frequently as an UFO. He was disappointed that it had not been as near and bright as he had observed on other occasions.
After about 15 sec., the UFO, which had been travelling horizontally westward, seemed to flicker and then vanished. The original object continued eastward, disappearing in the distance in a manner consistent with its identification as an aircraft. Duration of both observations was less than a minute.
On 14 August Wadsworth and Witness I drove to a village 20 miles south of the sighting area, where several sightings had been reported, and west and northwest toward towns A, B, and C. This area, had been most frequently indicated by observers as the apparent location of the UFOs. However, interviews with area residents disclosed no significant information.
Another sky watch that evening by Wadsworth, Witness I and his wife (Roach had gone) yielded nothing unusual until midnight. At 12:00 a.m. and again at 12:42 a.m. on 15 August UFOs were observed. They hovered, moved horizontally, and vanished. They appeared as bright orange lights showing no extended size and varying in intensity. Wadsworth thought they might be low-flying aircraft on flight paths that produced illusory hovering, but they could not be identified as such. Witness I described the lights as "good solid sightings," typical of the recurrent UFO sightings in the area. One of the sightings was later confirmed in all essentials by two women, who lived nearby.
The Monday night sighting was reported by telephone to the base
Project investigators then instituted a surveillance plan for the
night of 15-16 August. About 9:00 p.m., Wadsworth drove to a fire
lookout tower atop a mountain near the sighting area. This lookout,
the highest in the area, afforded an optimum view over the entire
valley. He carried a transceiver to communicate with Witness I in the
town of sighting for coordination of sighting observations, and was
accompanied by a local NICAP member. Also present were the resident
fire lookouts at the station.
At midnight orange lights appeared successively over the valley in
the direction of towns A, B and C (see map, figure 3). These lights,
observed simultaneously by Wadsworth and Witness I, appeared to
brighten, dim, go out completely, reappear, hover, and move about.
Sometimes two of them would move together for a few moments and then
separate. This behavior continued for an hour-and-a-half.
The mountain vantage point afforded a much more comprehensive view of
the phenomena than did the valley town site. It was possible to
observe a general pattern of movement that could not have been seen
from below, because the north end of this pattern was over Town C,
which was not visible from the sighting town. Even with binoculars
Wadsworth had to study the pattern for more than an hour before he
could begin to understand what was happening.
Essentially, the lights made long, low runs from Town C toward Town
B, which was not visible from the sighting town. Even with binoculars
Wadsworth had to study the pattern for more than an hour before he
could begin to understand what was happening. At other times they
appeared to hover, flare up, then go out completely. Witness I
believed that the lights flared up in response to signals he flashed
at them with a spotlight. Many of his flashes were followed by
flare-ups of the UFOs, but to Wadsworth these flare-ups appeared
coincidental.
Summary and Conclusion
The sightings were of interest for two reasons. First, the phenomena
were strange enough to defy simple explanation. Second, they were on
a large enough scale to arouse widespread interest. Sighting
frequency was high and did not decline with time.
However, the sightings were not individually spectacular, being
essentially lights in the night sky. This case is an example of
conventional stimuli (aircraft) that, by their unusual behavior,
lighting, and flight paths, presented an unconventional appearance to
witnesses.
Before the project investigation, observers had become loosely
organized around Witness I, who logged sightings, taped interviews
After examining the previously compiled information, project
investigators decided a more direct approach was needed. The methods
of inquiry and observations that they used resulted in the discovery
of a pattern of behavior readily identified with aircraft activity
originating from the local air base.
Figure 3: Castle AFB & Vicinity
Click on Thumbnail to see Full-size Image.