Many of the early UFO documents, often discovered at random or without other supporting material, have largely been viewed in light of the current thinking on UFOs, rather than using them to gain an understanding of how early policies and opinions on the UFO subject evolved.
Few understand how policies are formed in the military. Before a decision can be made recommendations are sought and studies undertaken. These usually contain various options and opinions. It is expected that many points of view will be submitted and the commander will announce a final decision on policy. Once that policy is decided, subordinates do not have to agree with it; however, they must support it. There are mechanisms in place for feedback, revision, and reversals of policy. Of course, as with any human organization, things do not always work smoothly. The unique structure of the military often times magnifies these shortcomings. For example, the WW II failure to take seriously intelligence briefings on the possible German attack in the Ardennes -- because it was at a variance with the current strategic thinking -- lead to a near military disaster. Often differences of opinion will last for years, and policies will change back and forth as proponents of one side or another achieve policy-making positions. Some of the early UFO documents indicate a disagreement as to how to handle the problem. Commanders, not staff, make policy. But if a commander is smart, he will delegate part of his authority to staff and subordinates to make decisions in his name. The commander may delegate authority, but never responsibility. Again, if he is smart, he will periodically insure that his delegated authority is being properly used. Dr. James McDonald and Dr. J. Allen Hynek in the latter days of Project Blue Book, tried to alert the command at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base that such delegation in UFO matters had become a problem.
|
USAF: Air Intelligence Requirement Division |
#1 and #3 |
USAF: Air Estimates Branch |
#4 |
Office Of Naval Intelligence |
#2 |
USAF: Air Intelligence Division |
#5 |
The surviving copy is #3. It was declassified on 5 March, 1985.
There are several attachments to both the draft and printed copy of the "Analysis." Attached to the draft is the following hand written note:
"All extra copies of this document were ordered to be destroyed. The note was written on a Memo Routing Slip, DD Form 95 which is commonly called a "buck slip" from the American slang "to pass the buck" i.e., give the problem to someone else. With the release of the Project Sign documents and other documents from HQ, USAF Intelligence many events at this time become clearer.
|
AFOIN-2BE |
||
Capt. Fournet/el/55894 |
||
Wrtn 5 Jun 52 |
PROBLEM |
Col J. G. Eriksen - AFOIN-2B3 - Ext. 52466 Capt. R. C. Bauer, USN - AFOIN-2B - Ext. 55909 Col. E. H. Porter - AFOIN-2 - Ext. 71110 |
The Memo was classified CONFIDENTIAL and
declassified 5 March 1985.
COMMENTS: Apparently when looking through the files Fournet came upon the draft first. Later this Memo was filed with the printed copy. Ruppelt said that both Col. Adams and Maj. Fournet were "believers." You don't find that in this official statement. The Top Secret Loan Sheet indicates that the document was due back on 8 July 1952. The first Memo Routing Slip has the following hand written message:
All extra copies of this document were ordered to be destroyed. The signature is the same one that appears on the draft and the last name now looks like "Buedolf". It is dated 6 Dec 51. The second Memo Routing Slip also hand written reads:
T. S. Control Note: "All published copies of this document have been ordered destroyed. This document for record purpose only not to be disseminated." On the memo is there are initials in the same hand writing as the other instruction memos. On the AF HQ Form 6, the Top Secret Register, there are 10 entries from 5 Dec 1950 to 24 Jun 1952. Except for Maj Fournet's entry, all concern the administrative handling of the document.
|
|
||||
|
|